A Primer on Charitable Lead Trusts
“A Primer on Charitable Lead Trusts,” that’s the subject of today’s ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk.
This is Susan Snyder, ACTEC Fellow from Chicago. To educate us on the rules that govern a popular gifting technique, Charitable Lead Trusts, you’ll be hearing today from ACTEC Fellow Kirk Hoopingarner from Chicago. Welcome, Kirk.
Thank you, Susan. A Charitable Lead Trust provides for income payments to at least one qualifying charitable organization for a period that is measured by either a fixed term of years or for the lives of one or more individuals or a combination of the two. There are two main types of payment terms for Charitable Lead Trusts: one, an Annuity Trust often referred to as a CLAT, where the charity receives an annuity that is either a fixed percentage of the initial fair market value of the trust assets, a fixed sum, or an amount that is based on a formula intended to produce a specific tax result. The other type is a Unitrust, often referred to as a CLUT, which is a fixed percentage of the net fair market value of trust assets, valued at least annually, usually the first business day of each calendar year.
The income taxation of the contribution and trust income is based on whether the grantor chooses to have the trust taxed as a Grantor Trust for income tax purposes. If a Grantor Trust, the grantor or donor will get an immediate charitable income tax deduction, based on the present value of the charitable annuity; then once the trust is operated, the grantor will be taxed on all the trust income during the term of the trust. If instead, the grantor chooses to have it as a Nongrantor Trust, the grantor does not receive an immediate income tax deduction for the contribution, but the trust is taxed as a complex trust during the term of the trust and the trust will receive a charitable deduction for the annuities that are being paid to the charities.
Most donors prefer the Nongrantor Trust, especially if they anticipate the trust income will be less than the charitable payments that are being made. However, if a donor would like a big deduction in the first year of the trust because the donor anticipates receiving substantial taxable income that year, a Grantor Trust may be preferred. The remainder interest usually is given either to the donor, also referred to as a reversionary interest, or the family of the donor, often done for a leverage technique to pass wealth gift tax-free. This leverage is the result of how the charitable income, gift and estate tax deduction is computed. The tax value of the charity payments is equal to the present value of the payments using as the discount rate 120 percent of the federal midterm rate under Code Section 1274(d)(1), and it’s rounded to the nearest 2/10ths of 1 percent. You can use a rate for one of the two months preceding the month of transfer. This means that when rates are relatively low as they have been for many years, the deduction is higher. And if the trust total annual return is much higher than the discount rate assumed, that extra amount actually provides for additional amounts to eventually pass gift tax-free to the family members designated to receive the remainder at the end of the term.
For example, if a donor contributed $1 million to a 10-year 5 percent Charitable Lead Annuity Trust, with the remainder going to his children and the discount rate at the time was 1.4 percent, and the trust actually earned 5 percent each year, then over $250,000 could pass to the children eventually, gift tax-free. Note that the same result would occur with a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust where nothing would go to charity. So, you really need a client who is both charitably inclined and also interested in benefiting the family for a CLAT to really make sense.
Some special rules to note — for a Grantor Trust CLAT, if the grantor dies during the term of the trust then it is subject to a special recapture rule where a portion equal to the original deduction minus the discounted value of all the amounts paid to the charitable lead prior to the grantor’s death will be subject to income tax when the grantor dies. A grantor of the Grantor Trust can at any time elect to release her reversionary interest and have the entire trust pass to charity without recognition of income. A special note for generation-skipping planning — where the grantor wants to have trusts eventually pass to grandchildren — CLATs do not work very efficiently because, for a Charitable Lead Annuity Trust, the exemption is allocated at the time plus a discount rate is applied, but the value at termination is the denominator. So if that trust appreciates greatly by the time the charitable lead terminates, that appreciation is all going to be part of the denominator and could cause an inclusion ratio greater than zero and cause a generation-skipping tax.
For CLUTs, however, the inclusion ratio is better in the computation because they focus on the value of the trust when it was created. One thing you may want to consider is using a Testamentary CLAT if your client has a taxable estate and is considering leaving a lump sum to charity. With such a trust, the charity would receive about the same amount, but over time. And the leverage from the lower discount rate would result in amounts passing estate tax-free to the client’s children. Also consider structuring the payment amount so that it increases every year. This is allowed by regulations and provides more leverage for eventual gifting to the remainder for the children. A relatively safe approach here would be to use the same rule that is applied for grantor retained annuity trusts which allow a 20 percent increase each year.
Charitable Lead Trusts are subject to annual filing requirements. You need to file a Federal Form 5227, and if it’s a non-grantor trust, a Form 1041. You also need to provide information to the grantor, if it’s a grantor trust, and for all trusts, they often need to be registered with the state body that administers charitable bequests and charitable organizations. While the federal estate tax exemptions are relatively high, there is not as much need or motivation to use CLATs for reducing transfer taxes like I described above. But if the exemptions decrease in 2026 or earlier or even further reduce, this could change. Also, any client considering a multi-year campaign pledge may want to utilize such a trust in making that multi-year grant to a charity. Thank you.
Thanks, Kirk, for teaching us about Charitable Lead Trusts.
This podcast was produced by The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, ACTEC. Listeners, including professionals, should under no circumstances rely upon this information as a substitute for their own research or for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own counsel. The material in this podcast is for information purposes only and is not intended to and should not be treated as legal advice or tax advice. The views expressed are those of speakers as of the date noted and not necessarily those of ACTEC or any speaker’s employer or firm. The information, opinions, and recommendations presented in this Podcast are for general information only and any reliance on the information provided in this Podcast is done at your own risk. The entire contents and design of this Podcast, are the property of ACTEC, or used by ACTEC with permission, and are protected under U.S. and international copyright and trademark laws. Except as otherwise provided herein, users of this Podcast may save and use information contained in the Podcast only for personal or other non-commercial, educational purposes. No other use, including, without limitation, reproduction, retransmission or editing, of this Podcast may be made without the prior written permission of The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel.
If you have ideas for a future ACTEC Trust & Estate Talk topic, please contact us at ACTECpodcast@ACTEC.org.
Latest ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk Podcasts
Learn about the risks of using gift and estate tax exemption that could impact the use of the remaining gift and estate tax exemption.
The conclusion of “Truth, Transparency, and the Right of Privacy.” Duncan Osborne shares his views on balancing attorney-client privilege and an individual’s right to privacy.
Pt. 2 of Truth, Transparency, and the Right of Privacy. Duncan Osborne, a chair of the Financial Action Task Force, shares lessons learned from FATF.