Understanding Rights of Publicity or Name, Image, Likeness (NIL)
“Understanding Rights of Publicity or Name, Image, Likeness,” that’s the subject of today’s ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk.
This is Travis Hayes, ACTEC Fellow from Naples, Florida. What are rights of publicity and how do various states treat these property rights? Today you will be hearing from ACTEC Fellow Chang Chae from Los Angeles, California. Welcome to Chang.
Introduction: Origins of Publicity Rights
Thank you, Travis. The right of publicity, which really involves the name, image, and likeness has become more important these days, especially when you’re dealing with celebrity or famous clients. The right of publicity is really the right to control the commercial use of the name, likeness, and image (NIL). Right of publicity recognizes an independent right to protect economic interests from unauthorized commercial appropriation of celebrities’ personas. And this came from Judge Jerome Frank in the famous Topps Chewing Gum case.
Right of publicity really evolved from the right of privacy, which is a personal, emotional interest. But unlike the right of privacy, the right of publicity is a property right. Its damages are determined by (1) the fair market value of the celebrity’s identity, (2) the profits of the person infringing on that right, and (3) damages to the celebrity’s licensing opportunities because of the infringement.
State Variation in Recognition and Protection
Because of this view that the right of publicity is a property right, in many states this right is freely transferable and descendible. On the other hand, right of privacy essentially dies with the death of the celebrity. In my research, at last count, upwards of 36 states currently recognize the right of publicity, 25 of them recognize a post-mortem right of publicity and some of the notable states include California, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington.
As most other rights protected by the various states, there are variances in how the right of publicity is enforced in these states. For example, Utah requires the celebrity to have commercially exploited his or her name and likeness during his or her lifetime in order for the right of publicity to be descendible. Utah may be the only state that requires this condition precedent.
In terms of the protected attributes, they, again, vary among the various states. For example, in California, beneficiary’s heirs have the right to control the exploitation of a deceased personality’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness. New York, which recently enacted their post-mortem right of publicity, limits their right to the personality’s name, portrait, picture, or voice. In Indiana, the rights include- among those that I indicated previously with California- include distinctive appearance, mannerisms, and gestures. So, one of the famous personalities from Indiana, David Letterman, you can see how perhaps his mannerisms would be protected in Indiana.
State Variation in Duration and Enforcement
Another area in which the states vary in their right of publicity statutes is the duration of the enforcement. In Washington, they have two separate time periods; one involving just ordinary individuals which is 10 years after the death of the individual. But if the individual’s name and likeness had a commercial value, then that right extends to 75 years, what they call personality. In New York, the right is enforced for 40 years after the death of the celebrity. In Indiana and Oklahoma, which may be the longest, it’s 100 years. In Tennessee, the right is enforced indefinitely so long as the estate continually exploits the celebrity’s attributes.
In California, it’s limited to 70 years, but California actually changed their statute some time ago to reach back to celebrities who died on or after January 1, 1915. And this was in response to the famous Marilyn Monroe case. In other states such as Illinois, it only applies for celebrities who died after the enactment of the statute. So, for example, in Illinois, the statute was enacted on January 1, 1999. So, it would apply for celebrities who died after that date and Illinois extends it for 50 years.
The last area I’m going to talk about in terms of the distinction among the states is sort of the nexus to that particular state for enforcement of the statute. In California, it requires the deceased celebrity to have been a California resident. In New York, the celebrity must have been domiciled in New York. Indiana requires only that the act or event occurred within Indiana regardless of the celebrity’s domicile or residence; except they do have one caveat and that is unless the person died intestate without surviving heirs, in which you could not apply the Indiana statute.
Washington, Hawaii, and Nevada have sort of broad statutes which doesn’t require the celebrity to have been a resident or been domiciled in that state. However, there’s a case in Washington involving Jimmy Hendrix where the court ruled that applying the broad Washington statute, regardless of domicile, was considered to be arbitrary and unconstitutional. And so, the question becomes whether you’re able to apply these broad statute in these states if you can overcome it, but in order to do so, you would have to overcome the argument that the statute may itself be unconstitutional.
Estate Planning with Publicity Rights
So, one last thing I wanted to talk about is in terms of protecting the publicity rights. What I mean by that is what do estate planners do, in terms of, with these rights. If the celebrity wants to be able to vest the control in a single individual to exploit the name and likeness. For example, many celebrities will have a business manager or an entertainment lawyer doing the exploitation and they may want him or her to continue to do so. In which case they would likely have to create a name and likeness type trust to hold those rights so that that individual can continue to exploit those rights for the benefit of the celebrity’s beneficiaries.
If there isn’t such a specific provision, then the name and likeness rights pass under the residuary provisions of the will or trust. And if the person had died intestate, then the rights to pass to their statutory heirs.
There are many more issues involving the right of publicity which involves things like valuation, but we’ll reserve those topics for another day. So, I hope this gives you a good snapshot of the right of publicity and it’s been my pleasure to do this podcast. Thank you.
Thank you, Chang, for discussing rights of publicity and the variances amongst the states.
You may also be interested in Estate Planning for Entertainment Clients.
This podcast was produced by The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, ACTEC. Listeners, including professionals, should under no circumstances rely upon this information as a substitute for their own research or for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own counsel. The material in this podcast is for information purposes only and is not intended to and should not be treated as legal advice or tax advice. The views expressed are those of speakers as of the date noted and not necessarily those of ACTEC or any speaker’s employer or firm. The information, opinions, and recommendations presented in this Podcast are for general information only and any reliance on the information provided in this Podcast is done at your own risk. The entire contents and design of this Podcast, are the property of ACTEC, or used by ACTEC with permission, and are protected under U.S. and international copyright and trademark laws. Except as otherwise provided herein, users of this Podcast may save and use information contained in the Podcast only for personal or other non-commercial, educational purposes. No other use, including, without limitation, reproduction, retransmission or editing, of this Podcast may be made without the prior written permission of The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel.
If you have ideas for a future ACTEC Trust & Estate Talk topic, please contact us at ACTECpodcast@ACTEC.org.
© 2018 – 2023 The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel. All rights reserved.
Latest ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk Podcasts
Estate planning attorneys discuss differences in legal traditions and post-mortem rules with creditors, probate, and trust administrations in different states.
Considerations in the Possible Liquidation of a Closely Held Entity and Other Alternatives (Pt. 4 of 4)
The final part of the Closely Held Entities series explores potential liquidation, including audit, valuation and tax issues, and where it may make sense not to liquidate.
In part 3 of Closely Held Entities, estate planners examine critical issues as well as discuss conducting a lifetime stress test for those entities.